
A glaring example of injustice to men. Tony Blair never seems to learn! Despite being badly let down by inneffective women cabinet members, he still wants more women MPs. The trouble is he doesn't care how he gets them. The first batch of Blair Babes elected from women-only short lists was declared illegal by the High Court, so he subsequently altered the law to avoid this happening again. Hence we had 30 constituencies in the country where men were disenfranchised. Happily, Mr Blair discovered in the recent election, that his dictatorial methods do not always pay off. In Blaenau Gwent, Peter Law stood as an independent and overturned a 19,000 Labour majority to win by a massive 9,000. Congratulations Mr Law! Shortly before the election results, Glenys Kinnock, appearing on TV,gave support to the sexist women-only short lists by saying that if women had to compete equally with men they would not be selected by the local party officials. How wrong she was! The people who voted against the women-only short lists and for Peter Law were the people of Blaenau Gwent, not any local Labour Party officials. And they did so in very large numbers! In a letter published in the South Wales Echo, commenting on a previous letter by a person called Ann Cox, Mr Gwyn Parry makes some interesting points: “Ann Cox believes Peter
Law, MP for Blaenau Gwent, should have stood aside so the women parachuted
in to represent Labour could have had a clear run in the General Election.
However, Mr Law, having left the Labour Party in protest against women-only short lists, and standing as an independent, overturned a 19,000 majority to win by more than 9,000 votes. It appears obvious
to me that the result was a clear indication that voters preferred
independent
Mr Law to represent them rather than the woman Labour candidate
Maggie Jones. Ann Cox stated that the sitting MP was about to retire, although I don't see how that justifies women-only short lists, and I would have thought that women-only short lists are rather demeaning to women in general. While
we are about it, why not men-only short lists, gay-only
short lists, disabled-only short
lists and ethnic-minority-only shortlists? The short lists are
endless. Political correctness gone mad. . . The correspondent seems more interested in making feminist politically correct points than advancing the selection on merit of prospective Parliamentary candidates.”
After the election, a badly bruised Mr Blair, nursing a savagely reduced majority, said that “He'd been listening”. Well, there's always a first time for everything! We must all hope that he heard loud and clear the message from Blaenau Gwent, that voters do not want women candidates thrust upon them, and, judging by the failure of women-only shortlists to get a lot more women into the Commons, neither does the rest of the country. Let's hope this misdirected misandry of the Labour Party will not raise its ugly head in any future elections. |